Skip to content

Gender differences and environmental inputs

March 6, 2010

In the comments section of my first post, commenter JB remarks

It is hard to fathom that well-to-do black women neglect to take doctor-recommended prenatal vitamins (which include magnesium). And that’s when vitamins are most important, no?

To which I reply:

I’d be willing to accept that genetic differences related to biochemical processing may also potentiate any environmental affects related to vitamin processing and blood-lead levels. Perhaps blacks simply have more difficulty utilizing vitamins and maintaining them in their bloodstream or removing toxins like lead for that matter?

My overall premise is that: Different groups may be more sensitive to certain environmental inputs than others.

While sex differences are more pronounced than racial differences, below I show a study on the effects of “social stressors” on pubertal and adult mice. Female mice exposed to pubertal or adult stress show significantly more sensitivity to amphetamines and nicotine, while males did not:

The present findings indicate that chronic social stressors alter HPA stress responses and locomotor responses to psychostimulants in females, and not in males, depending upon the age at which the animals underwent the social stressors procedure: Females stressed in adolescence showed enhanced behavioral sensitivity amphetamine, and females stressed in adulthood showed heightened corticosterone release in response to a new stressor.

[McCormick CM, Robarts D, Kopeikina K, et al. Long-lasting, sex- and age-specific effects of social stressors on corticosterone responses to restraint and on locomotor responses to psychostimulants in rats. Horm Behav. 2005;48:64-74.]

Human studies also show females are very negatively affected by stress in ways that males are not. This has societal implications as females will very soon outnumber males among medical school matriculates.

In contrast, prenatal exposure to nicotine appears to affect the blood pressure of male mice, but not female mice:

Prenatal nicotine had no effect on baseline BP but significantly increased Ang II–stimulated BP in male but not female offspring. The baroreflex sensitivity was significantly decreased in both male and female offspring. Prenatal nicotine significantly increased arterial media thickness in male but not female offspring. In male offspring, nicotine exposure significantly increased Ang II–induced contractions of aortas and mesenteric arteries. These responses were not affected by inhibition of endothelial NO synthase activity.

[Xiao D, Xu Z, Huang X, et al. Prenatal gender-related nicotine exposure increases blood pressure response to angiotensin II in adult offspring. Hypertension. 2008;51:1239-47.]

2 Comments leave one →
  1. March 6, 2010 3:42 pm

    If your theory is valid, the social implications are as follows:

    – The baseline for any public discussion of racial gaps in achievement must be the universal acceptance of IQ (or g) as a scientifically valid construct, of group differences in IQ and of the hypothesis that both genetic and environmental factors are involved.

    In other words, the consensus of Gottfredson et al. circa the Bell Curve controversy.

    IQ denialism could be hampering important research into environmental causes of cognitive underperformance and harming the very people its purveyors purport to protect.

  2. March 10, 2010 3:06 am

    Levi, you said this at Obsi’s blog:

    OneSTDV sounds like the kind of guy who brags about his school rank at parties, must be kinda embarrassing to even have to engage in a debate with a “working-class” black man. So ban ‘em. Seems reasonable.

    As you point out, gender differences are much more “real” from a genetic and neurological standpoint than racial differences. This is actually kinda relevant as females outnumber males in colleges and grad schools. Yet there is very little discussion of this in HBD-spheres: “How is America supposed to compete with East Asia with females at the top of corporate hierarchies (which east Asia doesn’t have)” etc.

    And I ask this:

    Are gender difference more real than racial ones? There’s a bigger IQ difference between a male and female Japanese than between a Japanese female and an African female?

    Any data?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: